Directive 05/CT-TTg: Vietnam's Crypto Framework Development and Its Strict New Rules

Directive 05/CT-TTg: Vietnam's Crypto Framework Development and Its Strict New Rules

Sep, 21 2025

Crypto Capital Requirement Calculator

Vietnam's Requirement

$379 million USD

10 trillion VND

How This Compares to Other Countries

On September 9, 2025, Vietnam’s government dropped a regulatory bomb: Resolution No. 05/2025/NQ-CP. It didn’t just tweak the rules-it rewrote the entire playbook for cryptocurrency in the country. No more gray areas. No more unregulated exchanges. If you want to operate a crypto platform in Vietnam now, you need at least 10 trillion VND-roughly $379 million-in capital. And that’s just the beginning.

What Exactly Is Directive 05/CT-TTg?

Directive 05/CT-TTg isn’t a standalone law. It’s the operational arm of Resolution No. 05/2025/NQ-CP, signed by Deputy Prime Minister Ho Duc Phoc. This isn’t a suggestion. It’s a mandate. The government is launching a five-year pilot program (2025-2030) to bring cryptocurrency under formal state control. Before this, Vietnam had one of the highest crypto adoption rates in the world-21 million users, according to Chainalysis. But nearly all of them were using platforms with no legal backing. Now, those platforms must either meet impossible capital requirements or shut down.

The Ministry of Finance is now the sole gatekeeper. No other agency can issue licenses. And the rules aren’t just strict-they’re designed to limit participation. Foreign ownership? Capped at 49%. Transactions? Must be in Vietnamese dong (VND) only. No USD, no EUR, no stablecoins backed by dollars or euros. That’s a huge deal. Stablecoins made up over 60% of all crypto transactions in Vietnam before this law. Now, they’re banned.

The $379 Million Barrier

Let’s be clear: $379 million isn’t a high bar. It’s a wall.

Compare it to Thailand’s requirement: 500 million THB ($13.7 million). Or Singapore’s flexible model, where capital depends on business scope. Vietnam’s requirement is 27 times higher than Thailand’s. That’s not about safety-it’s about control. Only a handful of state-linked or ultra-rich private groups can even begin to meet this. Smaller exchanges, the ones that served local users with low fees and fast withdrawals, are done. One Reddit user, HanoiTrader88, posted that his platform had $190,000 in capital. He’s out. No appeal. No grace beyond the six-month transition window.

And raising that kind of money isn’t easy. The resolution requires at least 65% of the capital-6.5 trillion VND-to come from institutional investors. That means banks, state-owned enterprises, or big conglomerates. No individual investors. No crowdfunding. No venture capital from startups. The system is built to favor existing power structures, not innovation.

Why VND-Only Transactions?

One of the most surprising moves is the ban on foreign currency settlements. Every trade, every deposit, every withdrawal must be in Vietnamese dong. The State Bank of Vietnam says this prevents capital flight-a real concern. In 2025, an estimated $10.2 billion flowed out of Vietnam through unregulated crypto channels. That’s a massive drain on the national currency.

But the side effect? It kills international liquidity. Traders who want to move between Bitcoin, Ethereum, or even stablecoins can’t easily convert to USD or EUR. They’re locked into VND. That means lower trading volumes, wider spreads, and less incentive for global traders to use Vietnamese platforms. Indonesia tried something similar in 2023. The result? Most users migrated to offshore exchanges. Vietnam could see the same.

Traders exchange crypto for Vietnamese dong while stablecoins are locked in a forbidden vault.

The Stablecoin Ban: A Strategic Mistake?

Here’s where the framework stumbles. The resolution explicitly bans crypto assets backed by fiat currencies or securities. That means no USDT, no USDC, no DAI. These stablecoins are the backbone of global crypto trading. They’re how people hedge volatility, move money quickly, and access DeFi. In Vietnam, they made up 63.8% of all crypto transactions in 2025.

By banning them, Vietnam is cutting off its own nose to spite its face. Why force users into a system where every trade requires converting to VND, then back to crypto? It adds friction, cost, and delay. It also makes Vietnam’s exchanges irrelevant to institutional players who rely on stablecoins for arbitrage and liquidity.

As Cointelegraph analyst Amin Haqshanas noted, this move “may limit its appeal to institutional investors.” That’s an understatement. It likely eliminates it.

Who Wins? Who Loses?

The winners? The state. The Ministry of Finance gains full oversight. The State Bank of Vietnam gets real-time transaction data through its new NDAChain blockchain system. Large, well-connected investors who can raise $379 million will get licenses-and likely a monopoly on the market.

The losers? Everyone else.

  • Small exchanges: 99% of the 21 million users won’t have legal platforms to use.
  • Traders: They’ll face higher fees, slower withdrawals, and fewer assets.
  • Innovators: Startups building DeFi tools or NFT platforms in Vietnam will lose their user base.
  • Investors: Those who lost money in 2022 when 15 unregulated platforms collapsed now have a regulated system-but one so restrictive it may not serve them better.

On Reddit, SaigonVC wrote: “Finally some regulation!” But that’s the voice of a wealthy investor who can afford to play by these rules. For the average Vietnamese crypto user, it’s a loss. A 2025 survey by CoinGeek found 79.6% of users think the capital requirement is too high. 41.2% said they’d move to offshore platforms if local options become too restricted.

Compliance Costs and Implementation Chaos

Even if you have the money, getting compliant is expensive. Legal firm Duane Morris Vietnam estimates it will cost between $1.9 million and $7.6 million per exchange to upgrade systems, integrate with NDAChain, implement KYC/AML protocols, and restructure ownership. That’s on top of the $379 million capital requirement.

And the regulators aren’t ready either. The Ministry of Finance created a Crypto Asset Regulatory Department (CARD) with 45 staff. But Vietnam’s Academy of Social Sciences says they need at least 120 to monitor 21 million users. That’s a 1:467,000 ratio. Compare that to the U.S. SEC’s ratio of 1:20,000 for broker-dealers. Vietnam’s system is set up to fail under its own weight.

The six-month grace period after the first license is issued is another wildcard. When will that first license come? The Ministry says applications open in 30 days, with first licenses in 90-120 days. That means users could be left in limbo for months. And when the grace period ends? Those still on unlicensed platforms could lose access overnight.

A lone trader looks at offshore platforms from a rooftop as Vietnam's regulated exchanges loom below.

What Happens Next?

Industry analysts predict only 3 to 5 exchanges will qualify for licenses in the first year. They’ll serve maybe 5 million users-down from 21 million. The rest? They’ll go offshore. Or they’ll use peer-to-peer (P2P) platforms, which are harder to regulate. Vietnam’s government might control the exchanges-but it can’t control the people.

Tax rules are coming. By November 15, 2025, capital gains will be taxed at 0.1% for trades under 100 million VND and 0.3% for larger ones. That’s low, but it’s another layer of control. The government wants to track every transaction, tax every gain, and own the narrative.

The five-year pilot includes review points at 12, 24, and 36 months. That means the rules could change. But don’t expect them to loosen. The government’s goal isn’t to foster innovation-it’s to capture control. Vietnam wants to be part of Southeast Asia’s digital economy, but on its own terms. And those terms are strict, centralized, and exclusionary.

How This Compares to the Region

Thailand licensed 12 exchanges by August 2025. Singapore allows foreign-owned platforms with flexible capital rules. Indonesia bans retail trading but lets institutions trade futures. China? Total ban. Vietnam sits in the middle-but leans hard toward China’s control model.

It’s not about being the most open. It’s about being the most secure-for the state. The trade-off? Innovation dies. User choice shrinks. And the market, once vibrant and grassroots, becomes a state-sanctioned oligopoly.

Final Reality Check

This isn’t a crypto-friendly policy. It’s a state control policy disguised as regulation. The government isn’t trying to protect users-it’s trying to prevent capital flight, eliminate competition, and take full ownership of the digital asset flow.

For users, the choice is simple: comply with a system designed to exclude you, or find another way. Many will choose the latter. And that’s the irony. The more Vietnam tries to control crypto, the more it pushes it underground.

The $379 million rule won’t stop crypto in Vietnam. It’ll just make it harder, more expensive, and less accessible. The real winners won’t be traders or startups. They’ll be the few entities that can afford to play by the new rules-and the government that now owns the game.

Is cryptocurrency legal in Vietnam now?

Yes-but only if you’re a licensed exchange that meets the government’s strict requirements. Individuals can still hold and trade crypto, but only through platforms approved by the Ministry of Finance. All unlicensed exchanges must shut down by the end of the six-month grace period after the first license is issued.

Can I still use USDT or USDC in Vietnam?

No. The new framework explicitly bans any crypto asset backed by fiat currencies like the U.S. dollar or euro. That means USDT, USDC, and similar stablecoins are prohibited on licensed Vietnamese exchanges. Users who want to trade them must use offshore platforms, which carry higher risks and no legal protection.

Do I need to pay taxes on crypto in Vietnam?

Yes. Starting November 15, 2025, capital gains from crypto transactions will be taxed. Transactions under 100 million VND (about $3,900) are taxed at 0.1%. Larger trades are taxed at 0.3%. This applies to all users, whether trading on licensed or unlicensed platforms, though only licensed platforms will report to tax authorities.

Can foreigners own a crypto exchange in Vietnam?

Foreigners can own up to 49% of a licensed cryptocurrency exchange in Vietnam. The remaining 51% must be held by Vietnamese individuals or entities. This rule is designed to ensure local control over financial infrastructure and prevent foreign dominance of the market.

What happens to small crypto exchanges in Vietnam?

They will be forced to shut down unless they can raise at least 10 trillion VND ($379 million) in capital, with 65% coming from institutional investors. Most small exchanges have less than $1 million in capital. Without access to that level of funding, they have no legal path to continue operating.

Will Vietnam’s crypto market shrink because of these rules?

Yes, significantly. Before the rules, 21 million Vietnamese users traded crypto. Analysts predict only 3-5 licensed exchanges will launch in the first year, serving at most 5 million users. The rest will likely move to offshore platforms, use P2P networks, or stop trading altogether. Transaction volume could drop by 75% or more in the short term.

How does this compare to other countries in Southeast Asia?

Vietnam’s rules are the strictest in the region. Thailand’s capital requirement is about $13.7 million-27 times lower. Singapore allows foreign ownership and has flexible capital tiers. Indonesia bans retail trading but allows institutional futures. China bans everything. Vietnam is in between-but leans toward China’s control model, with the highest capital barrier and the most restrictive asset rules.

Looking ahead, Vietnam’s crypto future won’t be defined by innovation or user freedom. It’ll be defined by control, capital, and compliance. The government has chosen its path. Now, the market must adapt-or disappear.

17 Comments

  • Image placeholder

    andrew seeby

    November 4, 2025 AT 17:59
    bro this is wild 😅 i thought vietnam was crypto heaven but now it’s like they turned it into a bank exam 😵‍💫
  • Image placeholder

    Pranjali Dattatraya Upadhye

    November 5, 2025 AT 19:57
    I mean… I get it, they’re trying to stop the money drain, but banning stablecoins? That’s like banning water because some people drink too much… 🤦‍♀️💸
  • Image placeholder

    Kyung-Ran Koh

    November 7, 2025 AT 00:57
    I love how they’re calling this 'regulation'-it’s not regulation, it’s a monopoly factory. Only the rich and connected get in. The rest? Out. Bye. 👋
  • Image placeholder

    Missy Simpson

    November 7, 2025 AT 16:56
    This is so sad… I know people in Hanoi who trade crypto daily to send money home or save for school. Now they’ll have to use shady P2P apps. Not safe. Not fair. 😢
  • Image placeholder

    Tara R

    November 9, 2025 AT 07:28
    The fact that anyone thinks this is a good idea is proof that regulatory capture is alive and well. The state doesn’t want to protect users-it wants to control them. End of story.
  • Image placeholder

    Matthew Gonzalez

    November 9, 2025 AT 17:15
    It’s not about crypto. It’s about power. The government sees decentralized money as a threat to its monopoly on trust. So they build a wall so high, only their friends can climb it.
  • Image placeholder

    Michelle Stockman

    November 10, 2025 AT 09:13
    Oh wow. 379 million? Who even has that? The Ministry of Finance just handed out a golden ticket to their cousins. Classic.
  • Image placeholder

    Alexis Rivera

    November 10, 2025 AT 17:47
    This reminds me of the Soviet Union’s attempt to control private trade. You can’t outlaw human behavior-you just make it more dangerous. People will find a way. Always.
  • Image placeholder

    Eric von Stackelberg

    November 11, 2025 AT 12:34
    Mark my words: this is the first step toward a national blockchain surveillance system. NDAChain isn’t for compliance-it’s for tracking dissent. They’re building a digital panopticon.
  • Image placeholder

    Emily Unter King

    November 12, 2025 AT 04:50
    The 65% institutional cap is a structural choke point. No VC, no angel investors, no bootstrapped teams-just state-aligned entities with balance sheets bigger than some countries’ GDPs. Innovation is dead here.
  • Image placeholder

    Ryan Inouye

    November 12, 2025 AT 10:46
    If you’re not a Vietnamese state-owned enterprise, you don’t belong in this market. That’s the message. And it’s not wrong. America’s got its own rules. This is just Vietnam’s version.
  • Image placeholder

    Chris Hollis

    November 13, 2025 AT 03:43
    They’ll regulate the exchanges. But P2P? Good luck. The real market will just go dark. And the tax people? They’ll get nothing.
  • Image placeholder

    Diana Smarandache

    November 14, 2025 AT 13:36
    This is the most dramatic thing I’ve read all week. The government just declared war on its own people’s financial freedom. And they think they’re being smart? I’m shaking my head.
  • Image placeholder

    Allison Doumith

    November 16, 2025 AT 09:44
    I feel so emotionally drained reading this. Like… why does every country think the answer is control? Why can’t they just let people be free with their money? It’s not about safety-it’s about fear.
  • Image placeholder

    Scot Henry

    November 16, 2025 AT 12:46
    I mean… I get the capital thing. But 10 trillion VND? That’s like saying ‘you can only open a coffee shop if you own Starbucks’. It’s not regulation. It’s exclusion.
  • Image placeholder

    Sunidhi Arakere

    November 17, 2025 AT 11:16
    The stablecoin ban makes no sense. People use them because they’re stable. Not because they want to escape the system. This will hurt the poor more than the rich.
  • Image placeholder

    Vivian Efthimiopoulou

    November 17, 2025 AT 14:24
    Let me be clear: this policy is not designed to protect consumers. It is designed to consolidate state power over financial infrastructure. The capital requirement is a deliberate barrier to entry. The VND-only rule is a monetary trap. The stablecoin ban is an economic self-sabotage. This is not a framework-it is a cage.

Write a comment