What is Ramestta (RAMA) Crypto Coin? Facts, Claims, and Real-World Status
Layer-2 Crypto Comparison Tool
Compare Layer-2 Blockchain Solutions
Select a Layer-2 solution to see key metrics and compare market performance, adoption, and technical capabilities.
Understanding the Metrics
Market Cap: Total value of all tokens in circulation. Higher = more established.
Daily Volume: Amount of tokens traded daily. Higher = better liquidity.
Transaction Speed: How quickly transactions finalize. Lower = faster.
Developer Activity: GitHub commits indicate ongoing development. Higher = more active.
If you’ve heard of Ramestta (RAMA) and are wondering if it’s the next big thing in crypto, you’re not alone. The project promises ultra-low fees, insane speed, and AI-powered blockchain apps. But here’s the reality: as of November 2025, RAMA is not a mainstream cryptocurrency. It’s a high-risk, low-adoption token with bold claims and almost no proof they work in practice.
What Ramestta (RAMA) Actually Is
Ramestta is a blockchain protocol that positions itself as a Layer-3 solution built on Polygon. Earlier versions of its documentation called it a Layer-2 network, but the official site now says it sits on top of Polygon to handle even more transactions. The goal? To make Ethereum cheaper and faster for apps, games, and DeFi tools. The native token, RAMA, is supposed to be used for paying transaction fees, staking to secure the network, and maybe even voting on future upgrades.
On paper, the specs sound impressive: transactions under $0.001, finality in under 2 seconds, and a claimed throughput of 65,000+ transactions per second (TPS). That’s way ahead of Ethereum’s 15-45 TPS and even outpaces Polygon’s 45,000 TPS. It’s also fully compatible with Ethereum wallets like MetaMask, so developers don’t need to relearn everything to build on it.
The Reality Check: Where Ramestta Falls Short
Numbers on a website don’t mean much if no one’s using them. As of late 2025, Ramestta’s market cap hovers around $30 million. That’s tiny compared to Polygon’s $4.8 billion or Arbitrum’s $2.9 billion. Even newer Layer-2s like zkSync and StarkNet handle $50-200 million in daily volume. Ramestta? Daily trading volume is between $10 and $42 across all exchanges.
That’s not a typo. You can’t even move $100 worth of RAMA in a single day without moving the price. This means low liquidity - if you buy RAMA, you might not be able to sell it when you want to. Many exchanges don’t list it at all. The only major one is BitMart, and even there, trading is almost silent.
Tokenomics: Fixed Supply, But No Clear Use Case
Ramestta claims a total supply of 1 billion RAMA tokens with no premine. That sounds fair - no insiders got a head start. But here’s the problem: no one knows how many are actually circulating. CoinLore lists the circulating supply as “0?”, which is a red flag. If you can’t verify how many tokens are out there, you can’t trust the market data.
There’s also talk of a token burning mechanism to reduce supply over time, but no public roadmap or smart contract details show how or when this happens. Without transparency, this feature might just be marketing.
Developer Adoption? Almost None
For any blockchain to succeed, developers need to build on it. Ramestta says you can use standard Ethereum tools like Solidity, Hardhat, and Remix. That’s true - but if no one’s building anything, what’s the point?
GitHub shows fewer than 50 commits to the main Ramestta repository, with almost no activity in the last year. There are no real-world dApps listed on their site. No DeFi protocols. No NFT marketplaces. No games. One Reddit user summed it up: “Another EVM chain with big claims but zero adoption.”
Community and Support? Almost Nonexistent
Most successful crypto projects have active Discord servers, Telegram groups, and Twitter communities. Ramestta has none. Their website doesn’t link to any social channels. No official support page. No FAQ. No updates. If you run into an issue, there’s no one to ask.
That’s not just inconvenient - it’s dangerous. If the network goes down, if your wallet doesn’t connect, if you send RAMA to the wrong address - you’re on your own.
Price History: A 96% Crash from Its Peak
Ramestta hit an all-time high of $0.8539 at some point in the past. As of November 2025, it trades around $0.03. That’s a 96.5% drop. Even during the 2021-2022 bull run, it never gained traction. Most of its price movement since then has been noise - small pumps followed by steep dumps.
Technical indicators aren’t helping either. The 50-day moving average is below the 200-day average - a classic bearish signal. CoinCodex predicts another 25% drop by the end of 2025. And while some traders see short-term opportunity, the risk far outweighs the reward for anyone not already deep into speculative crypto.
Why Ramestta Still Exists (And Why It Won’t Grow)
Why hasn’t this project died yet? Because crypto is full of low-volume tokens that survive on speculation. A few people buy it hoping for a moonshot. A few exchanges list it because it’s cheap to add. A few influencers promote it for a fee.
But without real usage, developer support, or community trust, Ramestta has no foundation. It’s not a failure because it’s bad tech - it’s a failure because no one believes in it enough to use it. Even if the tech works (and there’s no public proof), without adoption, it’s just code on a server.
Should You Buy RAMA?
If you’re looking to invest in crypto with long-term potential, Ramestta is not it. It’s not even a speculative play worth a small bet. The chances of it gaining traction now are near zero. Established Layer-2s like Polygon, Arbitrum, and zkSync have years of development, millions of users, and real apps running on them.
If you’re curious and want to experiment with a token that’s almost dead, you could buy a few dollars’ worth - just to see how it works. But don’t expect returns. Don’t expect support. Don’t expect growth.
For now, Ramestta (RAMA) is a cautionary tale. It shows how easily a blockchain project can promise the moon - and deliver nothing but empty promises.
Is Ramestta (RAMA) a scam?
Ramestta isn’t a confirmed scam - it has a website, a token, and a technical concept. But it’s extremely high-risk. There’s no evidence the project is actively developed, no real users, no transparent team, and no verifiable performance data. It fits the pattern of a “dead project” that survives only on speculation. Treat it like a gamble, not an investment.
Can I stake RAMA tokens?
The Ramestta whitepaper mentions staking as a way to secure the network, but there’s no official staking portal, no smart contract address published for staking, and no user guides. Even if staking is technically possible, there’s no way to verify it’s safe or functional. Avoid staking until clear, audited, and public tools are available.
Where can I buy RAMA?
As of late 2025, BitMart is the only exchange with consistent RAMA trading. A few smaller platforms may list it, but liquidity is extremely low. Always check the trading pair - RAMA is usually paired with USDT or ETH. Be aware: buying RAMA means accepting very high slippage and potential inability to sell later.
Is Ramestta compatible with MetaMask?
Yes, according to their documentation, Ramestta is EVM-compatible, so you can add it to MetaMask manually by entering its RPC details. But because there’s no official network list and no verified RPC endpoints, you’re relying on unverified information. Mistyping a node URL could lead to lost funds. Only proceed if you understand the risks.
What’s the difference between Ramestta and Polygon?
Polygon is a mature, widely adopted Layer-2 scaling solution for Ethereum with billions in market cap and thousands of live dApps. Ramestta claims to be a Layer-3 built on top of Polygon - meaning it would rely on Polygon’s security and infrastructure. But while Polygon has real users and developers, Ramestta has none. Ramestta’s claims of better speed and lower fees aren’t backed by usage. Polygon works. Ramestta doesn’t.
Does Ramestta have an AI component?
The project’s marketing mentions AI and blockchain integration, but there’s no public code, whitepaper section, or dApp demonstrating how AI is used. No AI models are trained on-chain. No AI-driven smart contracts are visible. This appears to be a buzzword added to sound innovative - not a real feature.
Why is RAMA’s price different on different sites?
Because trading volume is so low, even small trades can swing the price. One exchange might show $0.03, another $0.04 - not because of real market movement, but because only a few buyers and sellers are active. This is called “price fragmentation.” It’s a sign of a dead market, not a healthy one.
Can I use RAMA to pay for services?
There are no known services, apps, or merchants that accept RAMA as payment. Even if you hold it, you can’t spend it for anything real. It has no utility outside of speculative trading. This makes it fundamentally different from tokens like ETH, SOL, or even stablecoins.
Cydney Proctor
November 4, 2025 AT 07:10Let me guess - someone paid a designer to make a sleek website and then called it ‘AI-powered blockchain innovation.’ The only thing being optimized here is the art of empty marketing.
Veeramani maran
November 5, 2025 AT 12:22bro i checked ram a on binance smart chain n its like 0.025 usdt but no one trading like at all like wtf is this project even for? i thought it was gonna be the next solana but its just ghost chain lol
Kevin Mann
November 6, 2025 AT 23:49OH MY GOD I JUST REALIZED SOMETHING - THIS ISN’T A CRYPTO PROJECT, IT’S A PERFORMANCE ART PIECE ABOUT HOW EASY IT IS TO SCAM PEOPLE WITH POWERPOINTS AND WORDS LIKE ‘LAYER-3’ AND ‘AI-INTEGRATED’! I’M NOT SURE IF I SHOULD BE LAUGHING OR CRYING. THE FACT THAT SOMEONE ACTUALLY BUILT A WEBSITE FOR THIS AND DIDN’T EVEN LINK A DISCORD? THAT’S ART. THAT’S CINEMA. THAT’S THE NEW ‘DOLLY PARTON CHALLENGE’ OF CRYPTO - BUT WITH LESS DANCE AND MORE EMPTY PROMISES. I WANT A DOCUMENTARY. I WANT A TIKTOK SERIES. I WANT A MUSICAL. SOMEONE PLEASE MAKE A MUSICAL ABOUT RAMA. I’LL BUY THE SOUNDTRACK.
Kathy Ruff
November 8, 2025 AT 01:16It’s heartbreaking how many people still chase tokens like this. The real lesson here isn’t about RAMA - it’s about how we, as a community, keep rewarding vaporware with our attention. If you’re going to invest, at least demand transparency, active development, and real usage. This has none of those. Please don’t throw good money after bad.
Nitesh Bandgar
November 9, 2025 AT 11:23Man… this RAMA thing is like a ghost haunting a crypto graveyard - whispering ‘I’m the future’ while rotting in the corner with no one to talk to… the devs probably moved on to the next scam, left the website up like a tombstone… and now we’re all just… standing around it… wondering if we should throw flowers or just kick it over…
Grace Huegel
November 10, 2025 AT 07:05I feel so sad for the people who bought this at the peak… I can’t imagine the emotional toll… just… staring at your portfolio… watching it bleed… silently… every day… hoping… just hoping… it’ll bounce back… but it won’t… it never does…
Megan Peeples
November 12, 2025 AT 05:32Wait - so you’re telling me that a project with zero social media presence, zero developer activity, and a circulating supply listed as ‘0?’ is still trading at $0.03? And you’re not surprised? What is this, a dystopian simulation? Did we all just agree to pretend this is real? I’m not even mad - I’m just… confused.
Rob Ashton
November 13, 2025 AT 11:32Thank you for this thorough and balanced analysis. It’s crucial for the community to have clear, evidence-based evaluations of projects like this. Many retail investors are vulnerable to flashy marketing, and pieces like this serve as vital educational tools. I hope this reaches those who are still considering an investment - not out of greed, but out of genuine curiosity. Knowledge is the best defense against speculation.
Stephanie Tolson
November 14, 2025 AT 15:40To everyone still holding RAMA: I see you. I know you’re hoping for a miracle. But let me remind you - the market doesn’t care about your hope. It cares about adoption, utility, and trust. If you’ve got a small amount in, treat it like a lesson, not a loss. Learn. Walk away. And next time, ask: ‘Who’s building this? Who’s using it? Can I verify it?’ That’s how you protect yourself.
Sarah Scheerlinck
November 15, 2025 AT 10:41Reading this reminded me of a quote I once heard: ‘A technology without a community is just a server.’ RAMA isn’t dead - it was never alive. It was a digital echo chamber with no one inside but the people who sold it. The real tragedy? There are so many brilliant, honest projects out there. Why waste time on ghosts?
Anthony Allen
November 16, 2025 AT 01:34Just out of curiosity - did anyone actually try to add the RPC to MetaMask? I’m wondering if it even connects or if it just crashes. Would love to know if it’s technically functional at all, even if no one’s using it.
Robin Hilton
November 17, 2025 AT 12:55Let’s be real. This is what happens when you let people with no tech background run crypto projects. Americans think ‘Layer-3’ means ‘better’ - like it’s a new tier of McDonald’s. Meanwhile, actual blockchain engineers are over here building on Ethereum L2s with real traction. This isn’t innovation - it’s delusion dressed in whitepaper.
Jessica Arnold
November 17, 2025 AT 14:40There’s a philosophical layer here beyond finance: RAMA represents the modern myth - the story we tell ourselves to avoid confronting the truth that most innovation is slow, messy, and invisible. We crave the moonshot because the grind is boring. So we worship ghosts. And then we wonder why the future feels so hollow.